Taieb v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
This text of 456 N.E.2d 1197 (Taieb v. Hilton Hotels Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, with costs, plaintiffs’ motions for default judgment denied, defendant-appellant’s motion to compel [728]*728plaintiffs to accept its answer granted, and question certified answered in the negative. The allegation that defendant did not personally receive notice of the summons in time to defend is not contested and defendant may have a meritorious defense (CPLR 317).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
456 N.E.2d 1197, 60 N.Y.2d 725, 469 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taieb-v-hilton-hotels-corp-ny-1983.