Nutt v. Morse

6 N.E. 763, 142 Mass. 1, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 265
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 18, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 6 N.E. 763 (Nutt v. Morse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nutt v. Morse, 6 N.E. 763, 142 Mass. 1, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 265 (Mass. 1886).

Opinion

Morton, C. J.

The funds in this case are claimed by a brother, two sisters, and a nephew of the deceased, upon the ground that they were given to them severally by him during his lifetime. The claims of each stand upon the same grounds substantially, there being no material difference in the evidence as to each alleged gift. Upon the facts found by the master, it is clear that there was no perfected gift to either of the claimants. The deceased deposited the money in his own name as trustee of each claimant, and told the claimant that he had done so. The books were in the possession of Edgar S. Hayes, one of the claimants, but he held them, as he did other papers of the deceased, merely as his agent or servant.

Calvin Morse retained the entire dominion and control of the funds, both principal and interest, during his life, and the facts show conclusively that he intended that no title to or interest in the funds should pass to the several claimants until after his death. The transaction was intended to be in the nature of a testamentary disposition, and was an attempted evasion of the statute of wills. Sherman v. New Bedford Savings Bank, 138 Mass. 581, and cases cited.

It follows that the funds remained the property of the depositor at the time of his death, and belong to the administrator, to be divided according to the statute of distributions.

Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reynolds v. Reynolds
90 N.E.2d 338 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Buteau v. Lavalle
187 N.E. 628 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Garland
136 A. 459 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1927)
Jones v. Old Colony Trust Co.
146 N.E. 716 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Hicks v. Meadows
69 So. 432 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Staples v. Berry
85 A. 303 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1912)
Foley v. Harrison
136 S.W. 354 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
McEvoy v. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank
87 N.E. 465 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Coolidge v. Knight
80 N.E. 620 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Bailey v. New Bedford Institution for Savings
78 N.E. 648 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Noyes v. Institution for Savings
42 N.E. 103 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Sayre v. Weil
94 Ala. 466 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1891)
Alger v. North End Savings Bank
15 N.E. 916 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Smith v. Ossipee Valley Ten Cents Savings Bank
9 A. 792 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.E. 763, 142 Mass. 1, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nutt-v-morse-mass-1886.