Noyes v. Institution for Savings

42 N.E. 103, 164 Mass. 583, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 298
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 27, 1895·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Knowlton, J.

The plaintiffs’ testatrix, Annie M. Pike, deposited in the defendant savings bank the money for which this suit is brought, and kept in her possession during her life the deposit-book, which was found by the plaintiffs among, her effects after her death. The account in the book was headed, “ Annie M. Pike and Mary L. Hewetfc, Newburyport, payable to either or survivor.” It appears that the book was never in the possession of the claimant, and that she had no knowledge of the deposit until after the death of the testatrix. Upon these facts, it was rightly held that the deposit remains the property of the original depositor, and that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover. This is settled by a series of decisions in this Com[584]*584monwealth as well as elsewhere. Brabrook v. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank, 104 Mass. 228. Ide v. Pierce, 134 Mass. 260. Sherman v. New Bedford Five Cents Savings Bank, 138 Mass. 581, 582. Nutt v. Morse, 142 Mass. 1. Parkman v. Suffolk Savings Bank, 151 Mass. 218. Booth v. Bristol County Savings Bank, 162 Mass. 455, 457. Judgment on the finding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noyes v. Institution for Savings, 42 N.E. 103, 164 Mass. 583, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 298 (Mass. 1895).

42 N.E. 103 (Noyes v. Institution for Savings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manning v. United States National Bank
148 P.2d 255 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1944)
Buteau v. Lavalle
187 N.E. 628 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Christensen v. Ogden State Bank
286 P. 638 (Utah Supreme Court, 1930)
Lipman Oil Co. v. Schwind
285 P. 1025 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)
McGillivray v. First National Bank
217 N.W. 150 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)
Robinson v. Mutual Savings Bank
95 P. 533 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)
Bath Savings Institution v. Fogg
63 A. 731 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1906)
In re the Estate of Mart E.
5 Mills Surr. 197 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1906)
Industrial Trust Company v. Scanlon
58 A. 786 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1904)
Denigan v. San Francisco Savings Union
59 P. 390 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Welch v. Henshaw
49 N.E. 659 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)