Home/California Court of Appeal/Nuffer v. Ware

Nuffer v. Ware

94 P.2d 61, 34 Cal. App. 2d 602, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 149
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 19, 1939
DocketCiv. No. 2366
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 P.2d 61 (Nuffer v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nuffer v. Ware, 94 P.2d 61, 34 Cal. App. 2d 602, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 149 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

J.—This is a motion to dismiss the appeal. Notice of appeal from the judgment in the above-entitled matter was filed by Charles W. Hooper, intervener, on June 24, 1939, with the clerk of Imperial County. From the eer[603]*603tificate of the clerk it appears that since filing of the notice of appeal no proceeding was ever instituted for the preparation of a bill of exceptions or a transcript under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that the time to institute the same has expired. Service of the notice of motion to dismiss was duly made.

Under the authority of Robinson v. Pismo Oil Dome Co., 31 Cal. App. (2d) 716 [88 Pac. (2d) 725], the appeal is dismissed.

Marks, Acting P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nuffer v. Ware
94 P.2d 61 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 P.2d 61, 34 Cal. App. 2d 602, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nuffer-v-ware-calctapp-1939.