Nuckols v. Commissioner

1972 T.C. Memo. 153, 31 T.C.M. 761, 1972 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 104
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJuly 18, 1972
DocketDocket No. 569-70.
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1972 T.C. Memo. 153 (Nuckols v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nuckols v. Commissioner, 1972 T.C. Memo. 153, 31 T.C.M. 761, 1972 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 104 (tax 1972).

Opinion

Jack A. Nuckols v. Commissioner.
Nuckols v. Commissioner
Docket No. 569-70.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1972-153; 1972 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 104; 31 T.C.M. (CCH) 761; T.C.M. (RIA) 72153;
July 18, 1972
Clarence E. Barnes, for the respondent.

DAWSON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

DAWSON, Judge: Respondent determined the following Federal income tax deficiencies*105 and additions to tax against the petitioner:

Additions to Tax
Sec. 6653(b),
YearDeficiencyI.R.C. 1954
1959$ 4,417.95$ 2,208.98
19606,168.933,084.47
196113,564.846,782.42
196232,025.2116,012.60
196325,466.0712,733.03

This case was called for trial on April 3, 1972, at Charleston, West Virginia, pursuant to notice served on the parties on January 6, 1972. Petitioner did not appear at the trial and there was no appearance on his behalf since counsel had previously withdrawn.

The issues for decision are: (1) Whether the petitioner had unreported taxable income for each of the years 1959 through 1963 in the amounts respondent determined by the net worth and nondeductible expenditures method; (2) whether any part of the underpayment of tax for each of the taxable years 1959 through 1963 was due to fraud with intent to evade tax; and (3) whether assessment of any deficiencies determined for the years 1959 through 1963 is barred by the statute of limitations.

Findings of Fact

Jack A. Nuckols (herein called petitioner) was a legal resident of Shadyside, Maryland, when he filed his petition in this proceeding.

For the taxable*106 years 1959 through 1963, petitioner and his former wife, Mary S. Nuckols, filed joint Federal income tax returns with the district director of internal revenue at Parkersburg, West Virginia. Mary S. Nuckols did not petition this Court for a redetermination of the deficiencies and additions to tax included in the statutory notice of deficiencies mailed to the petitioner and Mary S. Nuckols on October 28, 1969. However, she has since been relieved of the liability for the deficiencies and additions to tax under the provisions of section 6013(e), Internal Revenue Code of 1954, the so-called "innocent spouse" statute.

During the years in issue the petitioner was president and controlling stockholder of the Raleigh Insurance Agency, Inc. (Raleigh, Inc.), Beckley, West Virginia. He also held similar positions in the Jack A. Nuckols and Company, Inc., and the West Virginia Hearing Aid Center, Inc. (formerly Dahlberg Hearing Center, Inc.), both of Charleston, West Virginia. During the years 1959 and 1960 the petitioner was a State Senator for the State of West Virginia. On March 24, 1961, he was appointed Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Department of Motor Vehicles, *107 for the State of West Virginia, a position he held until June 30, 1965.

In addition to serving as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles for the State of West Virginia during the years 1961 to 1965, petitioner was also engaged in the income-producing activities of Raleigh, Inc., the Jack A. Nuckols and Company, Inc., and the West Virginia Hearing Aid Center, Inc.

Petitioner married Jacqueline Dillow in 1966. During the years 1961 to 1965, when petitioner was Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Jacqueline Dillow was employed by the State of West Virginia as his private secretary. In that capacity she had authority over other secretaries in the Department.

During the years in issue the petitioner received substantial unreported taxable income from the Raleigh, Inc., in the form of payments for his personal expenses. These included payments for personal travel by petitioner, his family, his secretary and her son, as follows:

YearAmount
1959$3,660.90
19603,981.73
19614,715.72
19627,493.77
19635,531.41

On several occasions personal travel performed by Jacqueline Dillow or her son 763 was partly paid by Raleigh, Inc. That company, together with the State*108 of West Virginia, also paid for the transportation of petitioner's horses, furniture, golf equipment and his daughter's luggage. Other expenses paid by Raleigh, Inc., included payments for personal expenses connected with rent, utilities, dues and subscriptions and general expenses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abernathy v. Commissioner
1978 T.C. Memo. 370 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1972 T.C. Memo. 153, 31 T.C.M. 761, 1972 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nuckols-v-commissioner-tax-1972.