Nsane v. Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nsane v. Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc.

262 S.W.3d 299, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1225, 2008 WL 4133568

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 9, 2008

DocketED 90898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 S.W.3d 299 (Nsane v. Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nsane v. Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc., 262 S.W.3d 299, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1225, 2008 WL 4133568 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc. and Old Republic Company c/o Crawford/Broadspire appeal the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the “Commission”) affirming and adopting the Administrative Law Judge’s (the “ALJ”) *300 award of permanent total disability benefits to Awolowo Nsane for injuries to his head, neck, and body as a whole that occurred in January 2004. We find that the Commission did not err in affirming and adopting the AL J’s award.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc. and Old Republic Company c/o Crawford/Broadspire appeal the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the “Commission”) affirming and adopting the Administrative Law Judge’s (the “ALJ”) *300 award of permanent total disability benefits to Awolowo Nsane for injuries to his head, neck, and body as a whole that occurred in January 2004. We find that the Commission did not err in affirming and adopting the AL J’s award.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 S.W.3d 299, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1225, 2008 WL 4133568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nsane-v-prairie-farms-dairy-inc-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack