Novartis Pharma AG v. Incyte Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 2, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-00400·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UDSODCCU MSDENNYT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: 4/2/20 20 NOVARTIS INTERNATIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL AG, Case No. 1:20-cv-00400-GHW Plaintiff, STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY v. AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER INCYTE CORPORATION, Defendant. GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge: WHEREAS, all of the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties” and each individually, a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties to this action, their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, any other person in active concert or participation with any of the foregoing, and all other persons with actual notice of this Order will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: 1. With respect to “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that a person has designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential or Highly Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder: 2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (each, “Producing

Party”) may designate as Confidential that material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: (a) non-public, commercially sensitive, and/or proprietary information relating to any Party, their affiliates, and/or their business; (b) any information that would be designated and/or expected to be treated as confidential pursuant the parties’ November 24, 2009 Collaboration and License Agreement, as amended, including without limitation confidential information pursuant to Article XII thereto; (c) previously non-disclosed research and development, clinical trial, or other pharmaceutical development data or information;

(d) previously non-disclosed projected or actual financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins); (e) previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-public company; (f) previously non-disclosed business planning or forecasting information, product- development information, or marketing plans, or other similar materials; (g) any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or (h) any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after

the date of this Order. 3. The Producing Party may designate as Highly Confidential that material that the Producing Party reasonably and in good faith believes contains (a) highly sensitive and/or proprietary information, the disclosure of which would result in competitive, commercial, and/or financial harm to the Producing Party or its employees, affiliates, clients, or customers;

or (b) material that a Producing Party believes in good faith would not otherwise be adequately protected under the procedures set forth herein for Confidential Material. The designation of Discovery Material as “Highly Confidential” shall constitute a representation that such Discovery Material has been reviewed by counsel of record representing the Party making that heightened designation and that there is a good faith basis for such designation. If any Highly Confidential Discovery Material is produced by a nonparty to this litigation, pursuant to a subpoena or otherwise, such a nonparty shall be considered a Producing Party within the meaning of that term as it is used in the context of this Order and each of the Parties shall be treated as a Receiving Party. Highly Confidential information that originated with a nonparty may be designated as such and shall be subject to the restrictions on disclosure specified

herein. This paragraph does not modify or revise the obligation of any Party receiving any document(s) from a third party, pursuant to a subpoena or otherwise, to produce copies (designated as Highly Confidential or otherwise) to all parties to this litigation, subject to the confidentiality obligations set forth in this Order. 4. Copies or excerpts of information contained within, or summaries, notes, memoranda, correspondence, or charts containing any information from, a document or thing designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential shall also be treated respectively as Confidential or Highly Confidential. 5. Confidential or Highly Confidential Discovery Material shall not include information that at the time of the disclosure hereunder is available to the public, or after disclosure hereunder becomes available to the public. 6. With respect to Confidential or Highly Confidential Discovery Material other

than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” each page or portion of the protected material in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility, except that in the case of multi-page documents bound together by staple or other permanent binding, the word “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” as applicable, need only be stamped on the first page of the document in order for the entire document to be treated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” respectively, if appropriate; or (b) in the case of electronically stored information produced in native format, by including “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” as applicable, in the file or directory name, or by affixing the legend “Confidential” or “Highly

Confidential,” as applicable, to the media containing the Discovery Material (e.g., CD-ROM, floppy disk, DVD). Where only a portion of a document has been designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential, the Producing Party shall produce for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential information redacted. 7. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or testimony within deposition transcripts as Confidential or Highly Confidential Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential or Highly Confidential information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order” or “Highly Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” as appropriate or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript as well as the deposition exhibits that are to be designated “Confidential” or “Highly

Confidential” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript and its exhibits will be responsible for marking the copies in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person’s counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential as well as all of its exhibits. 8.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Novartis Pharma AG v. Incyte Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Novartis Pharma AG v. Incyte Corporation (Novartis Pharma AG v. Incyte Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)