Noss Co. v. United States
This text of 753 F.2d 1052 (Noss Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
6 ITRD 1928, 3 Fed. Cir. (T) 92
NOSS CO., Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Appeal No. 84-1255.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Jan. 30, 1985.
Mark D. Crames, Sandler & Travis, P.C., Miami, Fla., argued for appellant.
Kenneth N. Wolf, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge Intern. Trade Field Office, New York City.
Before BALDWIN, KASHIWA and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
BALDWIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that certain imported centrifugal cleaning machines called Radiclones were properly classified under item 661.95 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. We affirm.
OPINION
The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Court of International Trade. Noss Co. v. United States, 588 F.Supp. 1408 (C.I.T.1984).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
753 F.2d 1052, 6 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1928, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noss-co-v-united-states-cafc-1985.