Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Diaz
This text of 273 A.D.2d 211 (Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Robert Diaz appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Blydenburgh, J.), dated August 10, 1999, which, after a hearing to determine the validity of the service of process, denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The determination of the Supreme Court as to the credibility of the witnesses testifying before it is entitled to great deference on appeal because of its opportunity to see and hear the witnesses (see, Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Roth, 240 AD2d 466; Citibank v Baronat, 238 AD2d 369; Citibank v Freund, 238 AD2d 299). The Supreme Court’s determination that the plaintiff properly served the summons and complaint upon the appellant is supported by the record (see, Fosella Bldrs. & Gen. Contrs. v Silver, 208 AD2d 525).
The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. Joy, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D.2d 211, 709 N.Y.S.2d 439, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norwest-mortgage-inc-v-diaz-nyappdiv-2000.