Citibank, N. A. v. Baronat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Citibank, N. A. v. Baronat

238 A.D.2d 369, 657 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3830

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 238 A.D.2d 369 (Citibank, N. A. v. Baronat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Citibank, N. A. v. Baronat, 238 A.D.2d 369, 657 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Roger Baronat and Valerie Baronat appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated March 19, 1996, which, inter alia, denied their motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale entered against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[370]*370Based upon the Supreme Court’s determination on issues of credibility, which is entitled to substantial deference on appeal (see, McCray v Petrini, 212 AD2d 676), the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over the appellants pursuant to CPLR 308 (2) (see, Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v Arrao, 100 AD2d 949). Rosenblatt, J. P., Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Roger Baronat and Valerie Baronat appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated March 19, 1996, which, inter alia, denied their motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale entered against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[370]*370Based upon the Supreme Court’s determination on issues of credibility, which is entitled to substantial deference on appeal (see, McCray v Petrini, 212 AD2d 676), the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over the appellants pursuant to CPLR 308 (2) (see, Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v Arrao, 100 AD2d 949). Rosenblatt, J. P., Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 369, 657 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citibank-n-a-v-baronat-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack