Northrop v. Beale

299 U.S. 516, 57 S. Ct. 236
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 14, 1936·No. No. 546·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Petrie v. Nampa Irrigation District, 248 U. S. 154, 157; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U. S. 207, 209-210. Insofar as the papers whereon the appeal was allowed seek a review of the rulings of the Court of Appeals of Maryland upon questions of the asserted denial of rights under the Federal Constitution not involving the validity of any statute of the State, such papers are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari, § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 938), and certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northrop v. Beale, 299 U.S. 516, 57 S. Ct. 236 (1936).

299 U.S. 516 (Northrop v. Beale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Legacy Funding LLC v. Cohn
914 A.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
Rothenberg v. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. (In Re Rothenberg)
173 B.R. 4 (District of Columbia, 1994)
Saunders v. Stradley
333 A.2d 604 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
Bowling v. Slayton
344 F. Supp. 650 (W.D. Virginia, 1972)
Anderson v. Anderson
266 A.2d 56 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1970)
Quinn v. State
95 So. 2d 273 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)