Mrs. Rae K. Alpar v. Perpetual Building Association
This text of 262 F.2d 230 (Mrs. Rae K. Alpar v. Perpetual Building Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant attacks as void a foreclosure sale of real estate by appellee trustees under a deed of trust. She contends inter alia (1) that she was not in default the three months prerequisite to a foreclosure under appellee building as *231 sociation’s constitution; (2) that appel-lee building association’s board of directors had not requested the foreclosure as the said constitution required; (3) that the relationship of the trustees to the building association was improper; and (4) that the price paid by the building association for the property at the public foreclosure sale was.grossly inadequate.
We have examined all the contentions in the light of the record and find no basis on which to disturb the judgment of the District Court. Cf. Clark v. Trust Co., 100 U.S. 149, 25 L.Ed. 573 (1879); Realty Investment & Securities Corp. v. H. L. Rust Co., 71 App.D.C. 213, 109 F.2d 456 (1939); Jackson v. Fuller, 66 App.D.C. 239, 85 F.2d 816, certiorari denied 299 U.S. 608, 57 S.Ct. 236, 81 L.Ed. 448 (1936); Annotation, 138 A.L.R. 1013 (1941).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 F.2d 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mrs-rae-k-alpar-v-perpetual-building-association-cadc-1959.