Northgate Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided October 21, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-00769·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DISTRICT Northgate Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., ; Plaintiff, : : Case No. 1:19¢v769 v. ; : Judge: Susan J. Dlott Ford Motor Company, : : Magistrate Judge: Karen L. Litkovitz Defendant. :

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Ford Motor Company and Plaintiff Northgate Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., with each of the aforementioned referred to singularly as a “Party,” and referred to collectively as the “Parties,” stipulate and agree to the terms and conditions of this Stipulated Protective Order. To preserve the confidentiality of certain commercially sensitive, confidential and/or proprietary information that has been or will be requested and produced in discovery in this matter, it is therefore ORDERED THAT:

hs The Parties shall have the right to designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” any documents, things and information produced in this action which the producing Party believes contains trade secrets, confidential research, development, commercial or financial information or any other proprietary or confidential business information, subject to the limitations stated herein.

Bs All documents, things and information designated as confidential pursuant to paragraph | of this Protective Order (hereinafter "Confidential Documents") shall, subject to the provisions hereof, be used by the Parties receiving it only in connection with this action and appeal of this action. Material designated in this fashion shall not be used for any business, competitive or other purpose, and shall not be disclosed to any person or entity, except as provided herein. 3. All Confidential Documents produced pursuant to the Protective Order shall be so designated by stamping the document with the words “CONFIDENTIAL” or similar language at the time of its production. Inadvertent failure to designate a document as protected may be corrected by supplemental written notice given as soon as practicable. In the event that a Party receiving documents designated as being produced pursuant to the Protective Order disagrees with such a designation as to one or more documents, that Party shall have a right to seek a decision or order from the Court, pursuant to a noticed motion, voiding the designation in whole or in part. The Designating Party shall have the burden of proving that the designation of the document(s) at issue was appropriate. However, until such a time as the Court rules that a particular document or set of documents designated as being subject to this Protective Order are not subject to protection, the Parties will continue to treat any such designated documents as Confidential Documents. 4. Confidential Documents provided in the course of this litigation and any information contained therein shall be used solely for the purposes of prosecuting or defending the above-captioned action, preparing for, filing and responding to motions, preparing for the trial of this action, preparing for and participating in any appeal, and for no other purposes

whatsoever. Confidential Documents shall not be disclosed to any person or entity except in accordance with the terms of this Protective Order. 5. Except as otherwise provided in this Protective Order, a Party receiving Confidential Documents shall not disclose to anyone other than the Party, counsel for the Party, paralegals and office or other support staff assisting counsel in the litigation of this case, deponents, stenographic personnel, and the Court and court personnel. Under no circumstances, except those enumerated in this paragraph and the following paragraph, shall Confidential Documents be disclosed to any other person or entity. Prior to such disclosure, the Party shall inform such persons that the matter is confidential and may not be disclosed, except as provided in this Protective Order. In addition to those persons described in the preceding paragraph, a Party may disclose Confidential Documents to (i) experts and consultants retained by that Party in good faith to assist in the prosecution or defense of this action (and necessary employees of those experts and consultants), (ii) witnesses or prospective witnesses to whom counsel in good faith believes it necessary to disclose such Confidential Documents in order to prosecute or defend this action and (iii) copying services to which Confidential Documents are sent for reproduction in bulk; provided that, prior to such disclosure, counsel for the Party disclosing Confidential Documents shall advise such person or persons that such information, documents or things shall be kept confidential and may not be disclosed in any form or used for any purpose whatsoever other than those aforementioned. Furthermore, prior to disclosure of any Confidential Document to any person set forth in (i) and (ii) above, that person shall first read this Protective Order, and sign a copy of the Acknowledgment attached hereto, thereby becoming subject to this Protective Order.

6. Confidential Documents shall remain in the custody of counsel and experts and shall not be provided to other persons except as necessary to prepare for hearing, trial or any appeal of this action pursuant to paragraph 4 above. 2. In the event that counsel for either Party determines that the prosecution of this action requires that Confidential Documents be disclosed to persons not otherwise authorized herein, such counsel shall provide the other Party written notice of the intended disclosure (which notice shall specify with particularity the Confidential Documents to be disclosed and the identity of the otherwise unauthorized person). This written notice shall be given not less than ten (10) business days prior to intended disclosure, or such shorter period as is mutually agreeable to the Parties in any particular case. If, within ten (10) business days after receipt of such notice, a Party objects in writing to such disclosure, the Confidential Documents shall not be disclosed unless the Court so orders. 8, This Protective Order does not authorize filing protected materials under seal. No document may be filed with the Court under seal without the prior permission as to each such filing, upon motion and for good cause shown, including the legal basis for filing under seal. See Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co., 78 F.3d 219 (1996). A Party intending to file any document(s) containing any information designated as “Confidential” by the other Party or any nonparty must provide five days’ notice to the Designating Party, who shall then determine whether to seek leave of Court to have the Confidential Document(s) filed under seal. Unless the Court orders otherwise, all sealed documents shall be filed according to $.D. Ohio Civ. R. 5.2.1. 9, In the event that any Confidential Documents or any information contained therein or derived therefrom are used in depositions, the documents and information shall not lose their confidential status through such use, and the Parties shall take all steps necessary to

protect the confidentiality of the documents and information during and after such use. Depositions may be designated confidential by indicating that fact on the record at the deposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northgate Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, (S.D. Ohio 2019).

Northgate Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company (Northgate Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related