Northern Trust Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.

748 F.2d 803
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 23, 1984·No. No. 343, Docket 84-7505·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Northern Trust Company, as drawee and purported drawer of a forged negotiable instrument, sought in the district court to recover monies paid to The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., as drawee of the instrument. Judge Wyatt held that Northern Trust could not recover on the theory of money had and received, and had no cause of action for negligence or conversion. Moreover, he held that the final payment rule, see N.Y. Uniform Commercial Code § 3-418 (McKinney 1964), barred recovery by Northern Trust on theories of breach of warranty of presentment, breach of warranty on transfer and negligence. 582 F.Supp. 1380 (S.D.N.Y.1984). We find appellant’s claim of error to be without foundation, and affirm the judgment essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Wyatt’s thorough opinion below.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northern Trust Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 748 F.2d 803 (2d Cir. 1984).

748 F.2d 803 (Northern Trust Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related