Northern Lights Shopping Center v. State

207 N.E.2d 521, 15 N.Y.2d 960, 259 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1525
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Northern Lights Shopping Center v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 N.Y.2d 688
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 1965·No. Claim No. 34798; Claim No. 36697·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that it has been deprived of its property without just compensation in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights had not been violated. [See 15 N Y 2d 688.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northern Lights Shopping Center v. State, 207 N.E.2d 521, 15 N.Y.2d 960, 259 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1525 (N.Y. 1965).

207 N.E.2d 521 (Northern Lights Shopping Center v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.