Home/New York Court of Appeals/Northern Lights Shopping Center v. State

Northern Lights Shopping Center v. State

204 N.E.2d 333, 15 N.Y.2d 688, 256 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1688
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 7, 1965
DocketClaim 34798; Claim 36697
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 204 N.E.2d 333 (Northern Lights Shopping Center v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Northern Lights Shopping Center v. State, 204 N.E.2d 333, 15 N.Y.2d 688, 256 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1688 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinion

Orders affirmed, without costs.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Scileepi and Bergan. Judge Van Voorhis dissents, in part, in the following memorandum: I conclude with the majority that the circle and weaving lane created by the construction of Interstate Highway Route 81, the one-way routing of traffic on Route 11 and County Highway 208 abutting the subject property, and other elements of alleged consequential damage are not compensable, except that I think that the right of access to Route 11 and County Highway 208 (as it existed before these changes were made) has been unreasonably restricted. Reasonable access to a highway is a property right which cannot be taken without payment of just compensation. The rule of reason in restricting access in the interest of public safety is established by Red Apple Rest. v. McMorran (12 N Y 2d 203), and I think that it has been transcended in this case. The circumstance that appellant has claimed more than it is entitled to receive should not obliterate this factor from consideration. I would remand the case for a separate determination of this element of consequential damage.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knickerbocker Development Corp. v. State of New York
140 A.D.3d 1444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Ingber v. State
187 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Raj v. State
124 A.D.2d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
County of Erie v. Abbott-Ridge Roads
116 A.D.2d 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Hylan Flying Service, Inc. v. State
54 A.D.2d 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Sun Oil Co. of Pennsylvania v. State
50 A.D.2d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
La Briola v. State of NY
328 N.E.2d 781 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Linnecke
468 P.2d 8 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 N.E.2d 333, 15 N.Y.2d 688, 256 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/northern-lights-shopping-center-v-state-ny-1965.