North v. Russell
This text of 516 S.W.2d 103 (North v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Harlan Circuit Court denying relief by way of habeas corpus from a judgment of the Lynch Police Court. Appellant’s contention is that the police court judgment is void because the police judge is not a lawyer.
The motion for appeal is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf., Ditty v. Hampton, Ky., 490 S.W.2d 772 (1973).
There being no authority for the granting of bail pending an appeal from the denial of habeas corpus, that portion of the judgment permitting the appellant to remain free on bond was erroneous, cf. Crady v. Cranfill, Ky., 371 S.W.2d 640 (1963), and should be corrected forthwith. That the appellant is not entitled to bail in this proceeding does not, however, affect his entitlement, vel non, to bail in the event of an appeal from the judgment of the Lynch Police Court.
As corrected in accordance with this op-pinion, the judgment is affirmed.
All concur.
ORDER
The execution and enforcement of the mandate and the order remanding appellant to custody is hereby stayed pursuant to the order issued by Mr. Justice Potter Stewart, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. The stay shall remain in effect or be terminated in accordance with the terms of said order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
516 S.W.2d 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-v-russell-kyctapphigh-1974.