North Georgia Milling Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

North Georgia Milling Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co.

65 S.E. 410, 133 Ga. 170, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 177

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in North Georgia Milling Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 Ga. 113 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 12, 1909·Published

Opinion

Beck, J.

The trial judge being of the opinion that errors had been committed, and having undertaken to correct the same by the grant of a new trial, setting aside a second verdict in favor of the same party, this court will not interfere, it clearly appearing that certain of the assignments of error are not without merit. Casey v. Ehman, 102 Ga. 587 (27 S. E. 726).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, J.

The trial judge being of the opinion that errors had been committed, and having undertaken to correct the same by the grant of a new trial, setting aside a second verdict in favor of the same party, this court will not interfere, it clearly appearing that certain of the assignments of error are not without merit. Casey v. Ehman, 102 Ga. 587 (27 S. E. 726).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

North Georgia Milling Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co., 65 S.E. 410, 133 Ga. 170, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 177 (Ga. 1909).

Pincite

65 S.E. 410 (North Georgia Milling Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related