Casey v. Ehman

27 S.E. 726, 102 Ga. 587, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 635
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 4, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

The second grant of a new trial, on special grounds assigning error in rejecting evidence, will not be reversed by the Supreme Court, when upon an examination of the record it appears that the excluded evidence may have had some relevancy upon the issues involved. The trial judge being of the opinion that he committed error and having undertaken to correct the same, this court will not interfere, unless it is quite certain that there was no error.

Judgment on main bill of exceptions affirmed; .cross-bill dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey v. Ehman, 27 S.E. 726, 102 Ga. 587, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 635 (Ga. 1897).

27 S.E. 726 (Casey v. Ehman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Georgia Milling Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co.
65 S.E. 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)