Casey v. Ehman
27 S.E. 726, 102 Ga. 587, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 635
Opinion
The second grant of a new trial, on special grounds assigning error in rejecting evidence, will not be reversed by the Supreme Court, when upon an examination of the record it appears that the excluded evidence may have had some relevancy upon the issues involved. The trial judge being of the opinion that he committed error and having undertaken to correct the same, this court will not interfere, unless it is quite certain that there was no error.
Judgment on main bill of exceptions affirmed; .cross-bill dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Casey v. Ehman, 27 S.E. 726, 102 Ga. 587, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 635 (Ga. 1897).
27 S.E. 726 (Casey v. Ehman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
North Georgia Milling Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co.
65 S.E. 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)