North Broward Hospital v. State, Agency for Health Care Administration

District Court of Appeal of Florida

North Broward Hospital v. State, Agency for Health Care Administration

171 So. 3d 223, 2015 WL 4709138

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 7, 2015

DocketNos. 1D14-5568, 1D14-5570, 1D14-5571, 1D14-5572, 1D14-5574, 1D14-5575, 1D15-0661

StatusPublished

This text of 171 So. 3d 223 (North Broward Hospital v. State, Agency for Health Care Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

North Broward Hospital v. State, Agency for Health Care Administration, 171 So. 3d 223, 2015 WL 4709138 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Before us in these consolidated appeals are final orders the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) entered in section 120.57(1) proceedings, after an Administrative Law Judge in the Division of Administrative Hearings had remanded the cases to the Agency, and appellants had withdrawn their petitions for formal hearing.

Our jurisdiction to entertain an administrative appeal from a final closing order is clear. See Hill v. Div. of Ret, 687 So.2d 1376, 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (“A final order may or may not dismiss a petition for hearing or some other pleading. Its finality depends on whether it has brought the administrative adjudicative process to a close.”); see also Altee v. Duval Cnty. Sch. Bd., 990 So.2d 1124, 1124-25 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (granting petition for review of closing order, even though the closing order was deemed non-final agency action, on grounds immediate review was necessary to provide an adequate remedy).

In addition to closing the cases, the final orders went on to discuss the possibility of future petitions, proceedings or challenges, challenges we were told at oral argument no party has thus far sought to bring. The legal effect of any such possible petitions, proceedings or challenges was not, in any event, at issue before the Agency when the final orders were entered. Accordingly, in affirming the orders under review, we decline to address the Agency’s speculative obiter dicta.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON and OSTERHAUS, JJ., and LESTER, DON H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Before us in these consolidated appeals are final orders the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) entered in section 120.57(1) proceedings, after an Administrative Law Judge in the Division of Administrative Hearings had remanded the cases to the Agency, and appellants had withdrawn their petitions for formal hearing.

Our jurisdiction to entertain an administrative appeal from a final closing order is clear. See Hill v. Div. of Ret, 687 So.2d 1376, 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (“A final order may or may not dismiss a petition for hearing or some other pleading. Its finality depends on whether it has brought the administrative adjudicative process to a close.”); see also Altee v. Duval Cnty. Sch. Bd., 990 So.2d 1124, 1124-25 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (granting petition for review of closing order, even though the closing order was deemed non-final agency action, on grounds immediate review was necessary to provide an adequate remedy).

In addition to closing the cases, the final orders went on to discuss the possibility of future petitions, proceedings or challenges, challenges we were told at oral argument no party has thus far sought to bring. The legal effect of any such possible petitions, proceedings or challenges was not, in any event, at issue before the Agency when the final orders were entered. Accordingly, in affirming the orders under review, we decline to address the Agency’s speculative obiter dicta.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON and OSTERHAUS, JJ., and LESTER, DON H., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 So. 3d 223, 2015 WL 4709138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-broward-hospital-v-state-agency-for-health-care-administration-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack