North Alabama Express. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

996 F.2d 1072, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19582
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJune 30, 1993
Docket91-7662
StatusPublished

This text of 996 F.2d 1072 (North Alabama Express. v. Interstate Commerce Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
North Alabama Express. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 996 F.2d 1072, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19582 (11th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

996 F.2d 1072

NORTH ALABAMA EXPRESS., an Alabama Corporation; AAA Cooper
Transportation, Inc., an Alabama Corporation, Petitioners,
Alabama Public Service Commission; Milan Express, Inc., Intervenors,
v.
The INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and the United States of
America, Respondents,
Averitt Express, Inc.; Deaton, Inc., Intervenors.

No. 91-7662.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

June 30, 1993.

George M. Boles, Weaver, Boles & Elmore, Birmingham, AL, for Neely & North Alabama Exp.

Robert C. Black, Montgomery, AL, for AAA Cooper.

Suellen Powers Lambert, Alabama Public Service Com'n, Montgomery, AL, for Alabama Public Service Com'n-internor.

Gerald D. Colvin, Jr., Bishop, Colvin, Johnson & Kent, Birmingham, AL, for Milan Exp., Inc.

Sidney L. Strickland, Secretary, I.C.C., Michael Martin, U.S. Atty. Gen., Robert B. Nicholson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for I.C.C. & U.S.A.

Robert L. Baker, Buck & Baker, Nashville, TN, for Averitt Exp., Inc.

Kim D. Mann, Shawn, Berger & Mann, Washington, DC, for Deaton, Inc.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Interstate Commerce Commission.

(ICC No. MC-F-19804.)

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion Sept. 3, 1992, 11th Cir., 971 F.2d 661)

Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, RONEY* and GIBSON**, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The following sentence is withdrawn from our opinion in this case:

For instance, the ICC could not approve the transfer of intrastate routes in Alabama if the only other aspects of the transaction involved interstate routes between Oregon and California.

North Alabama Exp., Inc. v. I.C.C., 971 F.2d 661, 665 (11th Cir.1992). Otherwise, the petitions for rehearing filed by respondent Interstate Commerce Commission and intervening respondent Averitt Express, Inc. are denied.

*

See Rule 34-2(b), Rules of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

**

Honorable Floyd R. Gibson, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

North Alabama Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission
996 F.2d 1072 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
996 F.2d 1072, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-alabama-express-v-interstate-commerce-commission-ca11-1993.