North Alabama Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Eleventh Circuit

North Alabama Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission

996 F.2d 1072

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 30, 1993·No. No. 91-7662·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, RONEY * and GIBSON **, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The following sentence is withdrawn from our opinion in this case:

For instance, the ICC could not approve the transfer of intrastate routes in Alabama if the only other aspects of the transaction involved interstate routes between Oregon and California.

North Alabama Exp., Inc. v. I.C.C., 971 F.2d 661, 665 (11th Cir.1992). Otherwise, the petitions for rehearing filed by respondent Interstate Commerce Commission and intervening respondent Ayeritt Express, Inc. are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, RONEY * and GIBSON **, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The following sentence is withdrawn from our opinion in this case:

For instance, the ICC could not approve the transfer of intrastate routes in Alabama if the only other aspects of the transaction involved interstate routes between Oregon and California.

North Alabama Exp., Inc. v. I.C.C., 971 F.2d 661, 665 (11th Cir.1992). Otherwise, the petitions for rehearing filed by respondent Interstate Commerce Commission and intervening respondent Ayeritt Express, Inc. are denied.

North Alabama Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 996 F.2d 1072 (11th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

996 F.2d 1072 (North Alabama Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related