Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Norman v. ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC

Norman v. ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC

351 S.W.3d 249, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1426, 2011 WL 5064733
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 25, 2011
DocketED 95883
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 351 S.W.3d 249 (Norman v. ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norman v. ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC, 351 S.W.3d 249, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1426, 2011 WL 5064733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in an action to recover damages from injuries suffered when he was bitten by his dog while it was being examined by a veterinarian. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woods v. State
351 S.W.3d 249 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
351 S.W.3d 249, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1426, 2011 WL 5064733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-v-animal-emergency-clinic-moctapp-2011.