Norkunas v. Park Road Shopping Center, Inc.

474 F. App'x 369
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 6, 2012·No. No. 11-1486·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Norkunas appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of standing his claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2006). We have carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no legal or factual basis to reverse the district court’s conclusion that Norkunas failed to plead facts sufficient to state an actual or imminent injury or to question in this case the court’s refusal to broaden the bases for Article III standing. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Norkunas v. Park Road Shopping Ctr., Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norkunas v. Park Road Shopping Center, Inc., 474 F. App'x 369 (4th Cir. 2012).

474 F. App'x 369 (Norkunas v. Park Road Shopping Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Callum v. CVS Health Corp.
137 F. Supp. 3d 817 (D. South Carolina, 2015)
Hernandez v. County of Monterey
70 F. Supp. 3d 963 (N.D. California, 2014)
Gilkerson v. Chasewood Bank
1 F. Supp. 3d 570 (S.D. Texas, 2014)
Berthiaume v. Doremus
998 F. Supp. 2d 465 (W.D. Virginia, 2014)
Payne v. Chapel Hill North Properties, LLC
947 F. Supp. 2d 567 (M.D. North Carolina, 2013)
Payne v. TR Associates, LLC
880 F. Supp. 2d 702 (E.D. North Carolina, 2012)