Norkin v. Milman

202 So. 3d 871, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12414
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 2016·No. No. 3D15-1931·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm for the reasons articulated in the trial court’s detailed, well-reasoned order titled, “Order Granting Defendants’ Verified Motion to Strike Intervenors’ ‘Supplemental and Intervening Complaint as Sham’ (as Supplemented).”

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norkin v. Milman, 202 So. 3d 871, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

202 So. 3d 871 (Norkin v. Milman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.