Norkin v. Milman
202 So. 3d 871, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12414
This text of 202 So. 3d 871 (Norkin v. Milman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Norkin v. Milman, 202 So. 3d 871, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
Opinion
We affirm for the reasons articulated in the trial court’s detailed, well-reasoned order titled, “Order Granting Defendants’ Verified Motion to Strike Intervenors’ ‘Supplemental and Intervening Complaint as Sham’ (as Supplemented).”
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
202 So. 3d 871, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norkin-v-milman-fladistctapp-2016.