Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., Dba Kirby Engineering
542 U.S. 935, 124 S. Ct. 2926, 159 L. Ed. 2d 810, 72 U.S.L.W. 3767, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4590
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., Dba Kirby Engineering. Read the opinion of the Court — 542 U.S. 963 →
Opinion
C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., Dba Kirby Engineering, 542 U.S. 935, 124 S. Ct. 2926, 159 L. Ed. 2d 810, 72 U.S.L.W. 3767, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4590 (2004).
542 U.S. 935 (Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., Dba Kirby Engineering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.