Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., Dba Kirby Engineering

542 U.S. 963, 125 S. Ct. 25, 159 L. Ed. 2d 854, 73 U.S.L.W. 3204, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4988
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided September 24, 2004·No. 02-1028·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

C. A. 11th Cir. Parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question: “Does federal or state substantive law govern the questions presented?” The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file an amicus brief on the same question. Briefs are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, October 4, 2004. Twenty copies of the briefs prepared under this Court’s Rule 33.2 may be filed initially in order to meet the October 4 filing date. Forty copies of the briefs prepared under this Court’s Rule 33.1 are to be filed as soon as possible thereafter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., Dba Kirby Engineering, 542 U.S. 963, 125 S. Ct. 25, 159 L. Ed. 2d 854, 73 U.S.L.W. 3204, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4988 (2004).

542 U.S. 963 (Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., Dba Kirby Engineering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lenz v. Johnson
443 F. Supp. 2d 785 (E.D. Virginia, 2006)
State v. Dilts
103 P.3d 95 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Contreras
110 F. App'x 153 (Second Circuit, 2004)