Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Rapid Transit Co.

141 S.E. 882, 195 N.C. 305, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 72
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 14, 1928·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Staoy, C. J.

The facts are in dispute; they can be determined only by a jury. A continuous trespass may be enjoined, without an allegation of insolvency. C. S., 844; Kinsland v. Kinsland, 188 N. C., 810, 125 S. E., 625; Cobb v. R. R., 172 N. C., 58, 89 S. E., 807. . And where it can do no harm to grant the injunction, and a refusal is likely to subject one of the parties to further litigation, cost and trouble, the court will ordinarily interfere by orders until the facts can be found and the way made clearer. McCorkle v. Brem, 76 N. C., 407. See, also, D. L. & W. R. R. Co. v. Morristown, U. S., decided 20 February, 1928.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Rapid Transit Co., 141 S.E. 882, 195 N.C. 305, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 72 (N.C. 1928).

141 S.E. 882 (Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Rapid Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lance v. Cogdill
78 S.E.2d 319 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.
78 S.E.2d 116 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Huskins v. Yancey Hospital
78 S.E.2d 116 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Young v. . Pittman
29 S.E.2d 551 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Lawhon v. . McArthur
195 S.E. 786 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
New Hope Realty Co. v. Barnes
147 S.E. 617 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
Warren v. . Bourne
144 S.E. 541 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)