Lawhon v. McArthur

213 N.C. 260
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 23, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The facts are in dispute, and the case involves the cutting of timber trees. C. S., 845; Stewart v. Munger, 174 N. C., 402, 93 S. E., 927. The usual course in such circumstances is to continue the restraining order to the hearing, or else to require the defendant to give bond in the meantime. C. S., 846; Lewis v. Lumber Co., 99 N. C., 11, 5 S. E., 19; Lumber Co. v. Wallace, 93 N. C., 22; R. R. v. Transit Co., 195 N. C., 305, 141 S. E., 882. At any rate there was error in dismissing the action. Grantham v. Nunn, 188 N. C., 239, 124 S. E., 309; Sutton v. Sutton, 183 N. C., 128, 110 S. E., 77; Bradshaw v. Comrs., 92 N. C., 278; McIntosh, N. C. Prac. & Proc., 994.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawhon v. McArthur, 213 N.C. 260 (N.C. 1938).

213 N.C. 260 (Lawhon v. McArthur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION v. Davis
116 S.E.2d 792 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Town of Fremont v. Baker
72 S.E.2d 666 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)