Norfolk Southern R. v. Talbott

190 F. 737, 111 C.C.A. 465, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 3806
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 1911
DocketNo. 1,029
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 190 F. 737 (Norfolk Southern R. v. Talbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norfolk Southern R. v. Talbott, 190 F. 737, 111 C.C.A. 465, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 3806 (4th Cir. 1911).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record of this cause clearly discloses that as between the parties thereto substantial justice permeates the decree complained of. With great force technical objections have been presented by counsel for appellant as to the method of procedure adopted by the appellee in his efforts to collect the judgment rendered in his favor; but when we consider all of the circumstances involved in this litigation, it would not accord with the rules that do and should attend the administration of justice to reverse the said decree. The court below in a learned and forceful opinion, has fully stated the facts, and has reached a conclusion in which we concur. (C. C.) 183 Fed. 803.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bremer v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.
247 Ill. App. 406 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 F. 737, 111 C.C.A. 465, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 3806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norfolk-southern-r-v-talbott-ca4-1911.