Nordyke v. King

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nordyke v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 644 F.3d 776
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2009·No. 07-15763·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; ANN  SALLIE NORDYKE, dba TS Trade Shows; JESS B. GUY; DUANE DARR; WILLIAM J. JONES; DARYL N. DAVID; TASIANA WESTYSCHYN; JEAN LEE; TODD BALTES; DENNIS BLAIR, R.L. ADAMS; ROGER BAKER; MIKE No. 07-15763 FOURNIER; VIRGIL MCVICKER, Plaintiffs-Appellants,  D.C. No. CV-99-04389-MJJ v. ORDER MARY V. KING; GAIL STEELE; WILMA CHAN; KEITH CARSON; SCOTT HAGGERTY; COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; COUNTY OF ALAMEDA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed July 29, 2009

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Rawlinson did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

10273 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nordyke v. King, (9th Cir. 2009).

Nordyke v. King (Nordyke v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.