Nordyke v. King
This text of 664 F.3d 774 (Nordyke v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Russell Allen NORDYKE; Ann Sallie Nordyke, dba TS Trade Shows; Jess B. Guy; Duane Darr; William J. Jones; Daryl N. David; Tasiana Westyschyn; Jean Lee; Todd Baltes; Dennis Blair, R.L. Adams; Roger Baker; Mike Fournier; Virgil McVicker, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Mary V. KING; Gail Steele; Wilma Chan; Keith Carson; Scott Haggerty; County of Alameda; County of Alameda Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Donald Kilmer, Jr., The Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, San Jose, CA, Don B. Kates, Esquire, Battleground, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Thomas Peter Pierce, Richards, Watson & Gershon, Los Angeles, CA, Sayre Weaver, Esquire, Richards, Watson & Gershon, Brea, CA, Richard E. Winnie, Esquire, Oakland, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HARRY PREGERSON, STEPHEN REINHARDT, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, PAMELA ANN RYMER, MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, SUSAN P. GRABER, RONALD M. GOULD, RICHARD C. TALLMAN, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The panel opinion in Nordyke v. King, 563 F.3d 439 (9th Cir.2009), is vacated and the case is remanded to that panel for further consideration in light of McDonald v. City of Chicago, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 3020, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2010).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
664 F.3d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nordyke-v-king-ca9-2010.