Norda Essential Oil & Chemical Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Norda Essential Oil & Chemical Co. v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 474, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1974

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 25, 1950

DocketNo. 54349; protests 154060-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 24 Cust. Ct. 474 (Norda Essential Oil & Chemical Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norda Essential Oil & Chemical Co. v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 474, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1974 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of the essential and distilled oil of amyris balsamifera, which oil differs chemically from true sandalwood oil, and that following the decisions in Nylos Trading Co. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 86, C. D. 1133), affirmed in Same v. Same (37 C. C. P. A. 71, C. A. D. 422), and Fritzsche Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), importations of such oil would now be classified as all other essential and distilled oils, not specially provided for. Applying the principles of the cited decisions to the facts in the case at bar as established by the stipulation the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of the essential and distilled oil of amyris balsamifera, which oil differs chemically from true sandalwood oil, and that following the decisions in Nylos Trading Co. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 86, C. D. 1133), affirmed in Same v. Same (37 C. C. P. A. 71, C. A. D. 422), and Fritzsche Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), importations of such oil would now be classified as all other essential and distilled oils, not specially provided for. Applying the principles of the cited decisions to the facts in the case at bar as established by the stipulation the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Cust. Ct. 474, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norda-essential-oil-chemical-co-v-united-states-cusc-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack