Nora Phillips v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot.
This text of 102 F.4th 1110 (Nora Phillips v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NORA PHILLIPS; ERIKA No. 21-55768 PINHEIRO; NATHANIEL DENNISON, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-06338- Plaintiffs-Appellants, SVW-JEM
v. ORDER U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; MARK MORGAN; UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; MATTHEW ALBENCE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; CHRISTOPHER WRAY,
Defendants-Appellees.
Filed May 30, 2024
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Richard C. Tallman, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
Order 2 PHILLIPS V. U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROT.
ORDER
The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Plaintiffs-Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing, dkt. 58, is DENIED. Judge Ikuta voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Tallman so recommended. Judge Schroeder recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Judge H.A. Thomas recused herself and did not participate in the deliberations or vote. Plaintiffs-Appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc, dkt. 58, is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 F.4th 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nora-phillips-v-us-customs-and-border-prot-ca9-2024.