Noorani v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 8, 2004·No. 03-60671·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 8, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-60671 Summary Calendar

DILSHAD NOORANI,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A72 417 883 --------------------

Before JONES, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dilshad Noorani petitions this court for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration

Judge’s order denying her application for cancellation of removal

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). Noorani contends that her

removal from this country will cause her child undue hardship.

This court lacks jurisdiction to review the merits of Noorani’s

petition because the determination of this matter is subject to

the discretion of the Attorney General. 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(b)(1),

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-60671 -2-

1252(a)(2)(B); see Bravo v. Ashcroft, 341 F.3d 590, 592 (5th Cir.

2003); Camey-Miranda v. Ashcroft, No. 02-60971, 2004 WL 556934

(5th Cir. Mar. 23, 2004) (unpublished). Accordingly, the

petition for review is DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noorani v. Ashcroft, (5th Cir. 2004).

Noorani v. Ashcroft (Noorani v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bravo v. Ashcroft
341 F.3d 590 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)