Noorani v. Ashcroft
This text of Noorani v. Ashcroft (Noorani v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 8, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-60671 Summary Calendar
DILSHAD NOORANI,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A72 417 883 --------------------
Before JONES, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Dilshad Noorani petitions this court for review of the Board
of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration
Judge’s order denying her application for cancellation of removal
pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). Noorani contends that her
removal from this country will cause her child undue hardship.
This court lacks jurisdiction to review the merits of Noorani’s
petition because the determination of this matter is subject to
the discretion of the Attorney General. 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(b)(1),
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-60671 -2-
1252(a)(2)(B); see Bravo v. Ashcroft, 341 F.3d 590, 592 (5th Cir.
2003); Camey-Miranda v. Ashcroft, No. 02-60971, 2004 WL 556934
(5th Cir. Mar. 23, 2004) (unpublished). Accordingly, the
petition for review is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Noorani v. Ashcroft, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noorani-v-ashcroft-ca5-2004.