Nolan v. State

27 So. 2d 718, 32 Ala. App. 545
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 29, 1946
Docket7 Div. 880.
StatusPublished

This text of 27 So. 2d 718 (Nolan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nolan v. State, 27 So. 2d 718, 32 Ala. App. 545 (Ala. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

CARR, Judge.

The record on this appeal contains neither the transcription of the testimony nor the oral charge of the court. Under these circumstances we are not privileged to review the written charges. Curry v. State, 25 Ala.App. 283, 145 So. 168; Holmes v. State, 17 Ala.App. 631, 88 So. 194.

Another barrier to review appears. Each of the written charges bears the name of the trial judge, but not one of them contains the requisite endorsement “refused” or “given.” Title 7, Sec. 273, Code 1940; Pinkerton v. State, 31 Ala.App. 599, 20 So.2d 604; Batson v. State, 216 Ala. 275, 113 So. 300.

There is no error appearing in the record, and the judgment of conviction is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Curry v. State
145 So. 168 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1932)
Holmes v. State
88 So. 194 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)
Pinkerton v. State
20 So. 2d 604 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1945)
Batson v. State Ex Rel. Davis
113 So. 300 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 So. 2d 718, 32 Ala. App. 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolan-v-state-alactapp-1946.