Holmes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Holmes v. State

88 So. 194, 17 Ala. App. 631, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 247

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 1920·No. 6 Div. 700.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was- tried

and convicted under an indictment charging burglary, and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than one year and one day nor more than two years. The record contains no bill of exceptions and the time for filing one has expired. The refused charges and motion for a new trial cannot be considered, there being no bill of exception setting out the evidence in the trial. Ross v. State, 16 Ala. App. 393, 78 South. 309. The record discloses that the defendant was legally convicted; and, there being no error, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was- tried

and convicted under an indictment charging burglary, and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than one year and one day nor more than two years. The record contains no bill of exceptions and the time for filing one has expired. The refused charges and motion for a new trial cannot be considered, there being no bill of exception setting out the evidence in the trial. Ross v. State, 16 Ala. App. 393, 78 South. 309. The record discloses that the defendant was legally convicted; and, there being no error, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Holmes v. State, 88 So. 194, 17 Ala. App. 631, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 247 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

88 So. 194 (Holmes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related