Holmes v. State
This text of 88 So. 194 (Holmes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was- tried
and convicted under an indictment charging burglary, and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than one year and one day nor more than two years. The record contains no bill of exceptions and the time for filing one has expired. The refused charges and motion for a new trial cannot be considered, there being no bill of exception setting out the evidence in the trial. Ross v. State, 16 Ala. App. 393, 78 South. 309. The record discloses that the defendant was legally convicted; and, there being no error, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 So. 194, 17 Ala. App. 631, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-state-alactapp-1920.