Home/Supreme Court/Nolan v. Rhodes

Nolan v. Rhodes

378 U.S. 556, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1034, 84 S. Ct. 1906, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 842
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 22, 1964
Docket454
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 378 U.S. 556 (Nolan v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nolan v. Rhodes, 378 U.S. 556, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1034, 84 S. Ct. 1906, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 842 (1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment below is reversed. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533. The cases are remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions In Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds.

Mr. Justice Clark would reverse on the grounds stated in his opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 587. Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment because the Ohio system of legislative apportionment is *557 clearly a rational one and clearly does not frustrate effective majority rule. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 589.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Kasich
2012 Ohio 5367 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Armour v. State of Ohio
775 F. Supp. 1044 (N.D. Ohio, 1991)
Butcher v. Bloom
216 A.2d 457 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)
Buchanan v. Rhodes
249 F. Supp. 860 (N.D. Ohio, 1966)
Nolan v. Rhodes
251 F. Supp. 584 (S.D. Ohio, 1965)
Honsey v. Donovan
236 F. Supp. 8 (D. Minnesota, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 U.S. 556, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1034, 84 S. Ct. 1906, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolan-v-rhodes-scotus-1964.