Armour v. State of Ohio
This text of 775 F. Supp. 1090 (Armour v. State of Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Because the majority’s ruling in this case requires that the Court retain jurisdiction over this matter pending the drawing of new district lines for the Ohio House of Representatives districts, this case now presents the potential for a conflict of interest for me. Accordingly, I hereby recuse myself from any further participation in the matter, and I have this day advised the Chief Judge of the Circuit of this in order that he may determine whether another judge of the District Court shall be appointed to serve on this panel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
775 F. Supp. 1090, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14889, 1991 WL 204345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armour-v-state-of-ohio-ohnd-1991.