Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Noel v. State

Noel v. State

831 So. 2d 802, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18092, 2002 WL 31757210
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 2002
DocketNo. 2D01-3901
StatusPublished

This text of 831 So. 2d 802 (Noel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noel v. State, 831 So. 2d 802, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18092, 2002 WL 31757210 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Eugene Noel appeals his convictions and sentences following his no contest plea. He argues that his sentences for various crimes were in violation of what he thought the trial court indicated would be the sentencing range. However, Noel did not raise any objection at the time of sentencing, and he did not move to withdraw his plea. Because Noel failed first seek relief from the trial court, we affirm. See Lockhart v. State, 659 So.2d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Rackley v. State, 755 So.2d 833, 834 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lockhart v. State
659 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Rackley v. State
755 So. 2d 833 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 So. 2d 802, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18092, 2002 WL 31757210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noel-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.