Noel v. State
831 So. 2d 802, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18092, 2002 WL 31757210
Opinion
Eugene Noel appeals his convictions and sentences following his no contest plea. He argues that his sentences for various crimes were in violation of what he thought the trial court indicated would be the sentencing range. However, Noel did not raise any objection at the time of sentencing, and he did not move to withdraw his plea. Because Noel failed first seek relief from the trial court, we affirm. See Lockhart v. State, 659 So.2d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Rackley v. State, 755 So.2d 833, 834 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Noel v. State, 831 So. 2d 802, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18092, 2002 WL 31757210 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
831 So. 2d 802 (Noel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lockhart v. State
659 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Rackley v. State
755 So. 2d 833 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)