Lockhart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lockhart v. State

651 So. 2d 225, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2003, 1995 WL 80041

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 1995

DocketNo. 94-3333

StatusPublished

This text of 651 So. 2d 225 (Lockhart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lockhart v. State, 651 So. 2d 225, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2003, 1995 WL 80041 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Roger Lockhart, appeals the trial court’s sentencing disposition following the revocation of appellant’s probation. Specifically, appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to conform the written sentencing documents to reflect that portion of the court’s oral pronouncement at the sentencing proceeding, awarding appellant credit for prison time served before imposition of the subject sentences. We agree.

Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for correction of the written sentencing documents to reflect the orally pronounced award of prison credit. Appellant need not be present for this procedure. Davis v. State, 387 So.2d 490, 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Roger Lockhart, appeals the trial court’s sentencing disposition following the revocation of appellant’s probation. Specifically, appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to conform the written sentencing documents to reflect that portion of the court’s oral pronouncement at the sentencing proceeding, awarding appellant credit for prison time served before imposition of the subject sentences. We agree.

Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for correction of the written sentencing documents to reflect the orally pronounced award of prison credit. Appellant need not be present for this procedure. Davis v. State, 387 So.2d 490, 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

651 So. 2d 225, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2003, 1995 WL 80041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lockhart-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack