Nodwell v. . New York Railways Company
126 N.E. 916, 228 N.Y. 547, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1004
Opinion
We think that in the absence of evidence of the layout of the tracks and the nature of the curve, if any, along which the defendant’s car was approaching, the plaintiff failed to establish her freedom from contributory negligence.
*548 The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.
His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Pound and Crane, JJ., concur; Cardozo and Andrews, JJ., not voting.
Judgments reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nodwell v. . New York Railways Company, 126 N.E. 916, 228 N.Y. 547, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1004 (N.Y. 1920).
126 N.E. 916 (Nodwell v. . New York Railways Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nodwell v. . New York Railways Company
126 N.E. 910 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)