Noble v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Noble v. State

700 So. 2d 786, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11854, 1997 WL 637606

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 17, 1997

DocketNo. 96-01848

StatusPublished

This text of 700 So. 2d 786 (Noble v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Noble v. State, 700 So. 2d 786, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11854, 1997 WL 637606 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Jody Arlene Noble, challenges the imposition of a public defender’s lien pursuant to her convictions for possession of cocaine and driving while license suspended. She argues that the trial court erred in imposing the lien without informing her of her right to a hearing to contest the amount thereof. Since the trial court indeed failed to so advise Noble, this cause is remanded to provide Noble thirty days within which to file a written objection to the lien. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.720(d)(1). See also Bourque v. State, 595 So.2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). In the event Noble files a written objection, the lien shall be stricken but may be reimposed after notice and a hearing. See Bourque. See also James v. State, 696 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Remanded with instructions.

FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Jody Arlene Noble, challenges the imposition of a public defender’s lien pursuant to her convictions for possession of cocaine and driving while license suspended. She argues that the trial court erred in imposing the lien without informing her of her right to a hearing to contest the amount thereof. Since the trial court indeed failed to so advise Noble, this cause is remanded to provide Noble thirty days within which to file a written objection to the lien. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.720(d)(1). See also Bourque v. State, 595 So.2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). In the event Noble files a written objection, the lien shall be stricken but may be reimposed after notice and a hearing. See Bourque. See also James v. State, 696 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Remanded with instructions.

FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

700 So. 2d 786, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11854, 1997 WL 637606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noble-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack