No. 16826

286 F.2d 164
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 19, 1961
Docket17-71636
StatusPublished

This text of 286 F.2d 164 (No. 16826) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
No. 16826, 286 F.2d 164 (9th Cir. 1961).

Opinion

286 F.2d 164

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
JOINT COUNCIL OF TEAMSTERS NO. 37 AND LOCAL 501, etc., Respondent.

No. 16826.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

January 19, 1961.

Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Malet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Morton Namrow, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Green, Richardson, Green & Griswold, Donald S. Richardson, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for enforcement will be granted except to the extent it orders the respondents to reimburse the employees of Jones-Tompkins for all fees, dues and other money which they have been required to pay to Local 501 "by virtue of the illegal union security and hiring hall provisions and the unlawful hiring practices pursuant to the contract with Associated General Contractors which the board found in effect constituted a closed shop."

It is our belief that the evidence in support of the provisions of the order on which we decline enforcement is just too weak to support it, regardless of the outcome of Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., v. N. L. R. B., 107 U.S.App.D.C. 188, 275 F.2d 646, certiorari granted 363 U.S. 837, 80 S.Ct. 1610, 4 L.Ed.2d 1723. Cf. N. L. R. B. v. Mountain Pacific Chapter, 9 Cir., 270 F. 2d 425. If we thought the facts were as strong here as in Teamsters, supra, we recognize we should withhold decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 F.2d 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/no-16826-ca9-1961.