Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Nixon v. State

Nixon v. State

691 So. 2d 45, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3240, 1997 WL 163095
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 9, 1997
DocketNo. 96-2145
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 691 So. 2d 45 (Nixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nixon v. State, 691 So. 2d 45, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3240, 1997 WL 163095 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, we do so because habeas corpus is not a substitute for obtaining relief as to issues which could have or should have been raised in Rule 3.850 proceedings. See White v. Dugger, 511 So.2d 554 (Fla.1987). The two year “window” period for instituting such proceedings in the Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit in Pinellas County, Florida, "will expire in September of 1997.'

MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffin v. State
976 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 So. 2d 45, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3240, 1997 WL 163095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nixon-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.