Nixon v. State

748 So. 2d 376, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 350, 2000 WL 35858
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 19, 2000
DocketNo. 1D99-2847
StatusPublished

This text of 748 So. 2d 376 (Nixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nixon v. State, 748 So. 2d 376, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 350, 2000 WL 35858 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven Nixon appeals an order that denied his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We AFFIRM without prejudice to Nixon filing a 3.800(b) motion in the trial court before filing the initial brief in his direct appeal. See Amendments to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.111(e), 24 Fla. L. Weekly S530, S530-31, — So.2d -, 1999 WL 1029285 (Fla. Nov. 12, 1999) (adopting amendments, effective immediately, to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800 and Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(d), and explaining that “under the new rule 3.800(b)(2), if a notice of appeal has been filed, a motion to correct a sentencing error can also be filed in the trial court at any time until the first appellate brief is filed”).

KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800
761 So. 2d 1015 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
748 So. 2d 376, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 350, 2000 WL 35858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nixon-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.