Nixon v. Hyserott

5 Johns. 58
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The attorney was authorised to sell and to execute conveyances, and assurances in the law, of the lands sold ; but no authority was given to bind his principal, by covenants. A conveyance or assurance is good and perfect without either warranty or personal covenants ; and therefore they are not necessarily implied in an authority to convey ; an authority is to be strictly pursued, and an act varying in substance from it is void. There must be a judgment of nonsuit, according to the ’ direction in the case.

Van Ness, J.

having formerly been concerned as counsel in the cause, gave no opinion.

Judgment of nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nixon v. Hyserott, 5 Johns. 58 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).

5 Johns. 58 (Nixon v. Hyserott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hackworth v. Hastings Industrial Co.
142 S.W. 681 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)
Gilbert v. How
47 N.W. 643 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1890)
Schultz v. . Griffin
24 N.E. 480 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Bronson v. Coffin
118 Mass. 156 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1875)
Dart v. Hercules
57 Ill. 446 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1870)
Moody v. Threlkeld
13 Ga. 55 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1853)
Dennis v. Ashley's Administrators
15 Mo. 453 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1852)
Le Roy v. Beard
49 U.S. 451 (Supreme Court, 1850)
Peters v. Farnsworth
15 Vt. 155 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1843)
Taggart v. Stanbery
23 F. Cas. 615 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio, 1841)
Johnson v. Sukeley
13 F. Cas. 834 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio, 1841)
Andrews v. Kneeland
6 Cow. 354 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)
Fuller v. Hubbard
6 Cow. 13 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)
Wilson v. Troup
2 Cow. 195 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1823)