NINA ROHRER v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH

Court of Appeals of Georgia

NINA ROHRER v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH

DecidedAugust 23, 2023

DocketA23A1478

StatusPublished

This text of NINA ROHRER v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH (NINA ROHRER v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NINA ROHRER v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 23, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A1478. NINA ROHRER et al. v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH.

Nina Rohrer and Glen Rohrer sued the Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah, Georgia (the “City”) for negligence and loss of consortium. The City moved for summary judgment, arguing that the Rohrers failed to comply with the ante litem notice requirements of OCGA § 36-33-5. In response, the Rohrers argued, inter alia, that the ante litem notice requirements are unconstitutional. The trial court granted the City’s motion. The Supreme Court of Georgia “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been called into question.” Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga. 657, 657 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996) (citing Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (1)). Because it appears that the trial court necessarily ruled on the Rohrers’ constitutional challenges to OCGA § 36-33-5, jurisdiction over this appeal appears to lie in the Supreme Court. See Wilkes & McHugh v. LTC Consulting, 306 Ga. 252, 257 (1) (c) (830 SE2d 119) (2019) (observing that this Court properly transferred the appeal to the Supreme Court based on the plaintiffs’ First Amendment challenge to a statute, “which the trial court implicitly rejected” when it entered the order at issue on appeal). As the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction, see Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996), this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/23/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 23, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A1478. NINA ROHRER et al. v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH.

Nina Rohrer and Glen Rohrer sued the Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah, Georgia (the “City”) for negligence and loss of consortium. The City moved for summary judgment, arguing that the Rohrers failed to comply with the ante litem notice requirements of OCGA § 36-33-5. In response, the Rohrers argued, inter alia, that the ante litem notice requirements are unconstitutional. The trial court granted the City’s motion. The Supreme Court of Georgia “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been called into question.” Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga. 657, 657 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996) (citing Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (1)). Because it appears that the trial court necessarily ruled on the Rohrers’ constitutional challenges to OCGA § 36-33-5, jurisdiction over this appeal appears to lie in the Supreme Court. See Wilkes & McHugh v. LTC Consulting, 306 Ga. 252, 257 (1) (c) (830 SE2d 119) (2019) (observing that this Court properly transferred the appeal to the Supreme Court based on the plaintiffs’ First Amendment challenge to a statute, “which the trial court implicitly rejected” when it entered the order at issue on appeal). As the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction, see Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996), this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/23/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

NINA ROHRER v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nina-rohrer-v-mayor-and-aldermen-of-the-city-of-savannah-gactapp-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack