Nilda Iliana Rodriguez v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nilda Iliana Rodriguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 9871
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 31, 2013·No. 03-10-00715-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2013

NO. 03-10-00715-CR

Nilda Iliana Rodriguez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN; CONCURRING OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD; DISSENTING OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment of

conviction: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the trial

court’s judgment of conviction is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision

be certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nilda Iliana Rodriguez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Nilda Iliana Rodriguez v. State (Nilda Iliana Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.